Blog

When Can Police Search for Evidence Without a Warrant?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Dec 31, 2019 | 0 Comments

The Fourth Amendment is one of the most important protections that Americans have against police overreach. A bulwark of the Fourth Amendments is its requirement that police get a warrant before searching for evidence of a crime.

But the warrant requirement is not absolute. In fact, there are six exceptions to it that police regularly use to invade people's privacy and search for evidence of a crime.

1. The Suspect's Consent

The most common way for police to get around the protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment is to get the suspect's consent to a search. The rights provided by the Fourth Amendment need to be invoked. Giving your consent to a police search lets those rights fall away and gives police the power to do whatever they want without fear of violating your rights.

2. Emergencies

Also known as the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement, police don't need a warrant to search for evidence that will likely be destroyed or that can be discovered while responding to a legitimate emergency.

The reach of this particular exception is surprising, though. Police use it to justify conducting a breath test or a blood test of suspected drunk drivers – a search for a DUI crime – because blood alcohol content (BAC) slowly dissipates.

3. Vehicles

Police don't need a search warrant to go through a vehicle for evidence of a crime. This exception to the warrant requirement exists for two reasons:

  1. People have less privacy in a car so, in theory, a search is less intrusive
  2. Cars can be moved quickly, so waiting for a warrant might be too much of an obstacle for law enforcement

4. “Plain View” Searches

Police also don't need a warrant to search for evidence that is in plain view. If the evidence can be found by a police officer from a place they have a right to be, they don't need to get a warrant to do the search.

The extent of a “plain view” search is a hot topic for those done from police helicopters or aerial surveillance.

5. Searches in the “Open Field”

A drastic extension of the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement that has become an exception in its own right, the “open field” exception allows police to search for evidence of a crime anywhere that the suspect does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. This can even take them onto a suspect's property.

6. Searches Incident to an Arrest

Police can also search someone they are arresting without getting a warrant, first. This is supposed to allow police to check a suspect for weapons on their person and in their immediate surroundings to keep the officers safe.

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorney Joseph D. Lento

The good thing about these warrant exceptions is that it is up to the prosecutor to prove that one of them was in play when police conducted a warrantless search and discovered evidence of a crime.

Criminal defense lawyer Joseph D. Lento can fight to prevent them from proving that. Contact him online or call his law office in Philadelphia at (215) 535-5353.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience fighting for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, as well as New Jersey. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu