Blog

Three Exceptions to the Rule that Minors Accused of Crimes are Tried in Juvenile Court

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 13, 2019 | 0 Comments

A recent situation in north Philadelphia involving three teenage boys firing a gun at a crowd of people raises important questions about when minors are prosecuted as juveniles or adults.

Three Armed Boys Fire Into Philadelphia Crowd

The incident happened on the evening of May 10, 2019, and was captured on surveillance video.

According to the police reports so far, three armed boys fired guns from an alleyway in North Philadelphia on a passing crowd of people. Five of the ten people in the crowd were hit. One of them was hit by multiple bullets, including once in the back of the head.

That person is in critical condition in the hospital.

Police have not released the surveillance video because of the apparent ages of the boys, none of whom has been found, yet.

Police have said that the attack appears to have been premeditated: “They were obviously waiting” for the crowd, Philadelphia Police Commissioner Richard Ross stated.

Pennsylvania's Exceptions to Trying Minors in Juvenile Court

While it is still unclear exactly how old the teenage boys were, it sounds like there will likely be a question about whether they will be tried as adults or juveniles.

The general rule is that people under the age of 18 who have been accused of committing a crime will be treated as a juvenile, rather than as an adult. However, there are three major exceptions to that rule in Pennsylvania.

1. Murder

One of the most important exceptions is for murder charges. If prosecutors decide to pursue murder charges – which claim that the killing was done intentionally – then the defendant will always be tried as an adult. This can become an important situation if the man that was shot in the head does not recover from his injuries.

2. Use of a Deadly Weapon

Another exception that could also become implicated in this case involves assaults with a deadly weapon. Teens over the age of 15 can be charged as adults if they used a deadly weapon during the alleged crime.

3. Prior Convictions

Finally, Pennsylvania allows prosecutors to file adult criminal charges against people over the age of 15 if they have already been convicted of any of the following charges:

Joseph D. Lento: Criminal Defense in Philadelphia

The difference between facing a criminal allegation as an adult and as a juvenile cannot be overstated. The whole point of the adult and juvenile justice system is different: While the goal is to punish adults for their conduct, it is to rehabilitate juveniles.

Keeping a case in juvenile court can, in the end, be the most important part of a criminal defense strategy and the most important decision in an accused teenager's life.

Joseph D. Lento is a criminal defense attorney who can help. Contact him online or call his law office in Philadelphia at (215) 535-5353.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience fighting for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, as well as New Jersey. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania and New Jersey attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, Outside of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance is educational advice, and does not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu