A local woman was arrested in Nashville for allegedly trashing an Airbnb during a bachelorette party, raising the issue of whether intoxication can be a valid or a strong defense to a criminal charge.
Woman Admits to Trashing Airbnb After Drinking
According to the initial news reports of the story, a local woman was with her friends in Nashville, Tennessee, for a bachelorette party. While there, she kicked in the windows of the Airbnb where she was staying because she could not get back into the house. Once inside, she broke several things inside the home.
When police arrived, she told them that she had had two bottles of wine on her own and that she “went psycho” when she could not get back inside.
She was arrested and charged with vandalism.
The Intoxication Defense in Philadelphia
Each state has its own nuances in criminal defense law. However, if the incident had happened in Philadelphia, then Pennsylvania's intoxication defense would apply to her case.
The intoxication defense is a legal argument against a criminal accusation. It argues that the defendant should not be held accountable for the crimes they are accused of committing because they were too inebriated to understand what they were doing.
The involuntary intoxication defense is the stronger argument. It claims that the defendant was inebriated through no fault of their own – often because they were drugged by someone else.
The voluntary intoxication defense, however, is more common and covers situations like this one where the defendant got drunk of their own accord.
When Voluntary Intoxication Can Be a Strong Defense
Voluntary intoxication can be a strong defense in some criminal cases, but not others.
It is particularly strong in criminal allegations that require someone to carry a specific intent to do something. For example, to be convicted of burglary in Pennsylvania, the prosecutor has to prove that you were in a house for the specific purpose of committing a crime while inside. This sets burglary apart from less severe offenses, like trespassing.
Voluntary intoxication can be an effective defense to criminal allegations that require a specific intent because the inebriation can prevent you from forming that intent. The argument is that you were acting in a fog, instead, and should not be punished as if you had intended to do the deed.
That is why raising the intoxication defense is a risky decision to make. You essentially admit to the alleged crime, and only argue that you should not be punished to the full extent of the law because you were too inebriated to know what you were doing.
Criminal Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento Serves the Accused in Philadelphia
There are times when the intoxication defense is a valuable argument to make. Knowing when those times are, however, can take the input of a criminal defense lawyer like Joseph D. Lento. Contact him online or call his law office at (215) 535-5353 if you have been accused of a crime in the Philadelphia area and want effective legal representation.