Blog

When is Intoxication a Solid Defense to a Criminal Charge?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jun 12, 2019 | 0 Comments

A local woman was arrested in Nashville for allegedly trashing an Airbnb during a bachelorette party, raising the issue of whether intoxication can be a valid or a strong defense to a criminal charge.

Woman Admits to Trashing Airbnb After Drinking

According to the initial news reports of the story, a local woman was with her friends in Nashville, Tennessee, for a bachelorette party. While there, she kicked in the windows of the Airbnb where she was staying because she could not get back into the house. Once inside, she broke several things inside the home.

When police arrived, she told them that she had had two bottles of wine on her own and that she “went psycho” when she could not get back inside.

She was arrested and charged with vandalism.

The Intoxication Defense in Philadelphia

Each state has its own nuances in criminal defense law. However, if the incident had happened in Philadelphia, then Pennsylvania's intoxication defense would apply to her case.

The intoxication defense is a legal argument against a criminal accusation. It argues that the defendant should not be held accountable for the crimes they are accused of committing because they were too inebriated to understand what they were doing.

The involuntary intoxication defense is the stronger argument. It claims that the defendant was inebriated through no fault of their own – often because they were drugged by someone else.

The voluntary intoxication defense, however, is more common and covers situations like this one where the defendant got drunk of their own accord.

When Voluntary Intoxication Can Be a Strong Defense

Voluntary intoxication can be a strong defense in some criminal cases, but not others.

It is particularly strong in criminal allegations that require someone to carry a specific intent to do something. For example, to be convicted of burglary in Pennsylvania, the prosecutor has to prove that you were in a house for the specific purpose of committing a crime while inside. This sets burglary apart from less severe offenses, like trespassing.

Voluntary intoxication can be an effective defense to criminal allegations that require a specific intent because the inebriation can prevent you from forming that intent. The argument is that you were acting in a fog, instead, and should not be punished as if you had intended to do the deed.

That is why raising the intoxication defense is a risky decision to make. You essentially admit to the alleged crime, and only argue that you should not be punished to the full extent of the law because you were too inebriated to know what you were doing.

Criminal Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento Serves the Accused in Philadelphia

There are times when the intoxication defense is a valuable argument to make. Knowing when those times are, however, can take the input of a criminal defense lawyer like Joseph D. Lento. Contact him online or call his law office at (215) 535-5353 if you have been accused of a crime in the Philadelphia area and want effective legal representation.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience fighting for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, as well as New Jersey. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania and New Jersey attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, Outside of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance is educational advice, and does not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu