Blog

Is Refusing to Call Untrustworthy Cops to the Witness Stand the Best Way to Protect Defendants?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Nov 27, 2019 | 0 Comments

The police union in Philadelphia has vowed to appeal a court's ruling that the city's district attorney, Larry Krasner, could refuse to call certain police officers to the stand who had been labeled as unreliable witnesses.

The lawsuit has been a political spitting match since it was first filed. While Mr. Krasner's stance has been long overdue, an outright ban on some officers might not be as effective as allowing them to testify but disclosing their potential unreliability to the criminal defense lawyer.

Prosecutor Refuses to Call Certain Cops to the Stand, Police Sue

The whole altercation has been a result of the long-deteriorating reputation of the police force in Philadelphia. After years of misconduct and suspicious activity by officers that have infringed on the civil rights of all Philadelphians, civil rights lawyer Larry Krasner ran for the office of the district attorney and won.

One of the big decisions he made was to create and maintain a “Do Not Call List”: A list of police officers in Philadelphia that included cops whose history of misconduct and false statements made them too unreliable to call as witnesses in criminal cases.

By creating the list, Krasner wanted to protect people in Philadelphia and push lying cops off the streets by essentially making it pointless for them to gather evidence.

Rather than consider whether its officers had tarnished their reputation for honesty past the point of no return, the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 5 sued Krasner. Apparently, they thought they could force prosecutors to use a police officer's testimony in a criminal trial.

A judge threw the lawsuit out, but now the police are vowing to appeal the ruling.

Brady Disclosures Could Be a Better Strategy

Preventing police who have a known history of lying from taking the stand in a criminal trial is essential. Somehow, juries still see a police officer in uniform as a bastion of honesty, and will readily accept whatever they say as the truth.

However, banning prosecutors in the district attorney's office from calling certain cops to the witness stand might not be the best way to protect Philadelphians.

Instead, the district attorney's office might be better off providing the defense attorney a record of a police officer's past misconduct as a part of their Brady disclosures.

Brady disclosures are batches of potentially exculpatory evidence that the prosecutor uncovered in his or her investigation of the crime. By law, evidence that could be used to prove the defendant's innocence has to be disclosed to the defense lawyer.

An example of potentially exculpatory evidence: A police officer's history of providing false testimony.

By disclosing the cop's past misconduct, it would allow the defense lawyer to grill the officer on the stand, revealing specific instances of their prior dishonesty and laying out exactly why the jury should doubt what the cop says happened. This would protect the defendant, and would also draw out, again and again in every case the officer testified the cop's prior conduct.

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a criminal defense lawyer serving Philadelphia. Contact him online or call his law office at (215) 535-5353.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience fighting for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, as well as New Jersey. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu