Blog

Mental Health Defenses: Insanity Defense and Guilty But Mentally Ill

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jun 20, 2020 | 0 Comments

In May 2020 in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, a four-year-old boy was found naked and covered in gasoline. Soon thereafter, authorities located and apprehended the boy's father, 27-year-old Josiah James Macintosh reeking of gasoline and with a disposable lighter in his possession.

After telling police that he was trying to “burn the demon out” of his son, Macintosh was arrested and charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, making terroristic threats, arson, and child endangerment.

While there's no way to know what was happening in the mind of Macintosh during the time of the incident, his reference to demons suggests that perhaps he may not have been in full control of his mental faculties. In situations such as these where a defendant may be able to argue that they couldn't appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct — or even that they couldn't know what they were doing or if they did now, that what they were doing was wrong — they may be able to present a mental health defense.

Insanity Defense

If successful, insanity it is a complete defense to a crime in Pennsylvania. That is, if a judge or jury finds that a person meets the legal standard for insanity, they will also find that the person is not guilty by reason of insanity.

Pennsylvania follows the M’Naghten Rule to determine whether a defendant is legally insane. The burden of proof is on the defense to show by a preponderance of the evidence that a person was incapable of knowing what they were doing at the time of the crime or if they were capable of knowing, that they were incapable of judging that what they were doing was wrong.

Importantly, this test is a legal one and not a medical one, so it is crucial to have an experienced medical health defense lawyer by your side if you would like to pursue this defense at trial.

Guilty But Mentally Ill

A jury or judge who has concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime but that is not convinced that the defendant is legally insane may find that the defendant is mentally ill and lacked the substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct. In this instance, they may issue a “guilty but mentally ill” verdict.

Notably, a person found guilty but mentally ill still receives punishment under sentencing guidelines but also gains the right to “appropriate psychiatric treatment.”

This area of law is highly nuanced and can be quite confusing, especially as laws concerning the insanity defense and mental health defenses vary by state. If you are facing serious criminal charges and your mental health may be an issue, please contact Joseph D. Lento online today or call 888-535-3686 to begin working on your defense.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience fighting for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, as well as New Jersey. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu