Blog

Is the Defense of Another Person Justified in a Domestic Assault Case?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 29, 2020 | 0 Comments

A large number of alleged domestic violence incidents involve only the two people. Frequently spouses, these allegations often stem from arguments that allegedly became physical. However, other instances of alleged domestic violence could involve other individuals besides the two main parties.

For example, an alleged domestic violence altercation could involve a married couple as well as one or more of their children. When multiple parties are involved, it is possible that a defense known as justification could come into play.

In Pennsylvania, you are justified in the use of force in order to protect another person from an unlawful attack. This defense can result in avoiding any criminal liability, even when you would otherwise meet the elements of domestic assault under the statute.

When the Justification Defense Applies

The justification defense as it applies to the defense of others is found in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 506. The statute highlights three elements that must be satisfied to justify the use of force to protect another person. These elements include:

  • That the defendant only used the amount of force they would have been entitled to use to defend themselves;
  • under the circumstances as the defendant understood them, the person they sought to protect would be justified in using such protective force; and
  • the defendant believed that his intervention is necessary for the protection of such other person.

First and foremost, the statute makes no mention of any relationship between the defendant and the person they intervened on the behalf of. This means you could use this defense to stand up for a loved one or a total stranger. If you use force against a spouse or family member in an effort to protect another person from harm, you could be entitled to a justification defense.

This defense is not without its limits, however. You must have held a reasonable belief your intervention was necessary. If a reasonable person would have looked at the situation and believed the third party was not at risk, a conviction for domestic assault would have been likely.

The statute only holds the defendant to the standard of acting reasonably given the information they had available. The use of force in the defense of another person is often based on a split-second decision. Even if you are ultimately mistaken on whether force was necessary, you could avail yourself to a defense of others claim if the facts as you knew them made it seem reasonable.

Discuss your Defense Options with Joseph D. Lento

Ultimately, the judge or jury will determine if your use of force was reasonable or if you committed an act of domestic assault. However, the way you approach the judge or jury with your defense strategy is vital in the outcome of your case. By helping the judge or jury understand your frame of mind at the time of the alleged assault, you can give them a reason to find that you were justified in your use of force to defend another person. If you are facing charges of domestic violence, contact Joseph D. Lento online or call (215) 535-5353 right away.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience fighting for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, as well as New Jersey. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu