Blog

Do You Have a Right to a Unanimous Verdict in a Criminal Trial? The Answer is Surprisingly Complicated

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 17, 2019 | 0 Comments

In a recent blog, we covered how a mistrial was declared in a case where a man admitted to breaking off the thumb of a Terracotta Warrior in a Philadelphia museum. In that case, the 12-member jury split, 7 to 5, in favor of acquittal.

The mistrial raises an important, supposedly simple, but actually quite complicated question: Does it take a unanimous jury to convict someone of a crime?

Unanimous Verdict Required in Federal Criminal Cases

Nowhere in the Constitution does it explicitly state that criminal defendants are entitled to a unanimous verdict. Instead, the Sixth Amendment merely says that the jury be “impartial” and come from “the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.”

However, there is a federal law – Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 31 – that requires a unanimous verdict in all criminal cases brought in federal court. That law became effective in 1946.

Supreme Court: Non-Unanimous Verdicts Permissible in State Court

The vast majority of criminal cases, however, are brought in state court. These cases use state court rules, and do not have to follow Rule 31.

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that states could set their own rules that could allow for criminal convictions with less than a unanimous jury. In a very complicated court case from 1972, Johnson v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court stretched the words of the Sixth Amendment to include a right to a unanimous jury, before promptly limiting that right to criminal cases in federal court.

Nearly All States Have Laws that Require Unanimous Verdicts

However, nearly all states have passed laws that require unanimous verdicts of guilt in criminal cases in state court. In 2018, Louisiana passed an amendment to its state constitution that required unanimous verdicts in criminal trials, leaving Oregon as the only state that did not require a unanimous verdict.

Supreme Court to Revisit the Issue

Now, a case has reached the Supreme Court that could extend the Sixth Amendment right to a unanimous verdict to cases in state courts, too.

That case involves a Louisiana man who was convicted of second degree murder. The jury voted 10-2 for conviction, but his trial happened in 2016, before Louisiana changed its state constitution to require unanimous verdicts. He was convicted and sentenced to life in jail.

He appealed his conviction, claiming that he had a Sixth Amendment right to a unanimous verdict, and argued that this right should not be limited to strictly federal court cases. Instead, he argued, it should be incorporated to apply to the states, as well.

The Court is expected to decide the case, Ramos v. Louisiana, in the Fall Term.

Joseph D. Lento: Philadelphia's Criminal Defense Lawyer

As you can see, the answer to such a simple question – do you have a right to a unanimous verdict in a criminal case – is nuanced. You have a right to one under the U.S. Constitution, but only if your case is in federal court. In Pennsylvania state court, you have a right to one under state law or, depending on how the Supreme Court rules in Ramos, a constitutional right to one under the Sixth Amendment.

If you have been accused of a crime in Philadelphia, call criminal defense lawyer Joseph D. Lento at (215) 535-5353 or contact him online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience fighting for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, as well as New Jersey. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania and New Jersey attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, Outside of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance is educational advice, and does not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu