Blog

Challenging Temporary PFA Orders

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 26, 2022 | 0 Comments

Multiple national and local press reports reveal the story of a prominent primary candidate for Pennsylvania's lieutenant governorship successfully challenging a temporary PFA order, resulting in the case's dismissal. As would generally be the case per Pennsylvania PFA court procedure, the candidate's wife had obtained the temporary PFA, issued before the candidate had notice of the filing and an opportunity to challenge it at an open hearing. The court promptly scheduled a hearing on whether to turn the temporary order into a final (permanent) order. PFA procedures require a prompt "final" hearing. At the "final" hearing, the court then dismissed the temporary order and case when cross-examination of the wife proved the order unnecessary and inappropriate. The candidate did not testify and presented no other witnesses on his behalf, confirming that even the wife's testimony alone did not prove the abuse necessary for the court to issue a permanent PFA order.

Temporary PFA Orders

Section 6107(b) of Pennsylvania's Protection from Abuse Act authorizes the court to issue a temporary PFA order when the plaintiff files a complaint. The Act requires no notice to the defendant that the plaintiff has sought a PFA order because notice could trigger the very violence that the PFA order would attempt to prevent. Instead, the court conducts an ex parte hearing with only the plaintiff present. Ex parte hearing may give the court enough information to issue the temporary PFA order. But ex parte hearings are notorious invitations for the plaintiff to give false or exaggerated, and surely one-sided, testimony. The defendant isn't there to challenge the allegations. Under Section 6017(b), the court must still find evidence of abuse. But with only the plaintiff present to give only one side of the story, courts pretty readily issue temporary PFA orders. Better to temporarily protect a plaintiff claiming abuse until a full hearing than to risk leaving an abused plaintiff unprotected.

Hearings on Final PFA Orders

Section 6107(a) of the Pennsylvania Protection from Abuse Act requires the court to conduct a full hearing within ten days of the complaint, about which the defendant will have notice and at which the defendant may be present. And that's what happened in the above candidate's case. The court, in that case, held the full hearing eight days after issuing the temporary order. The wife's complaint had not alleged direct physical abuse. It instead alleged various threats that, if true and carried out, would have constituted abuse. Cross-examination of the wife at the full hearing revealed sufficient inconsistency or incredibility in the wife's accounts of those threats. The court could not find the required evidence of abuse or threats of abuse. The candidate's representative declared the outcome a complete vindication, although the temporary PFA order and public reports certainly did not help the candidate's campaign. He lost in the May primaries.

Premier Pennsylvania PFA Defense Attorney

Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm provide aggressive, effective, and winning defense of unjust PFA order requests. Don't let a temporary PFA order become an unnecessary, unjust, and harmful final (permanent) PFA order. Call 888-535-3686 for attorney defense now, or use the online service.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia and across Pennsylvania as well as in New Jersey and nationwide. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. With unparalleled experience occupying several roles in the criminal justice system outside of being an attorney, Joseph D. Lento can give you valuable behind-the-scenes insight as to what is happening during all phases of the legal process. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide. In the courtroom and in life, attorney Joseph D. Lento stands up when the bell rings!

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience successfully resolving clients' criminal charges in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania counties. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you or a loved one, contact the Lento Law Firm today! Criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento will go above and beyond the needs of any client, and will fight until the final bell rings.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu